Navigating the Digital Fog: How Geopolitical Actors Manipulate Information in the AI Era

In an increasingly interconnected world, where news spreads at the speed of light and social media shapes public discourse, understanding who controls the narrative is more critical than ever. Geopolitical actors are not merely bystanders; they are sophisticated players who actively adapt their messaging to global events and specific audiences, often exploiting the very digital platforms we use daily. And with the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the landscape of information manipulation is undergoing a profound transformation.

The Ever-Expanding Digital Battleground

The digital space has become a primary arena for influence operations. Recent analyses show a significant expansion in monitoring, from just two social media platforms to ten key platforms: X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, BlueSky, YouTube, Telegram, VK (VKontakte), OK (Odnoklassniki), Threads, and TikTok. This broad reach allows actors to process massive amounts of data—over 11 million posts and comments were collected between June 2024 and May 2025 alone—to refine their strategies.

Platform importance varies depending on the topic and language:

• X (formerly Twitter): While it has the highest number of posts, particularly for broad geopolitical issues, it’s primarily used for broad amplification. Pro-Russian actors heavily rely on simple reposts on X (87.8% of all reposts) to fabricate popularity and evade moderation, creating what can be described as a "broad amplification swarm".
• Telegram, VK, and OK (Odnoklassniki): These platforms are predominantly used for Russian-language content and cater to a loyal, harder-to-reach core audience. They are crucial for specific regional and exercise-related content and are where narrative framing, audience grooming, and counter-messaging often originate through a richer mix of commenters and reply-commenters. They also frequently host lengthy, complex texts that are difficult to fact-check.
• YouTube and TikTok: These platforms demonstrate significant engagement and reach, especially for longer narrative-building videos. TikTok, for example, saw a notable shift in messaging around the US elections, moving from discussions of nuclear risks to overwhelmingly praising a potential Trump-Putin partnership and criticizing "deep-state" NATO policies.

Geopolitical actors employ a deliberate multi-platform amplification strategy, seeding identical or near-identical narratives across both open and semi-closed networks. This ensures redundancy, exploits the distinct audience demographics of each service, and creates the illusion of broad, organic consensus through repetition. This coordinated approach is evident in the fact that Kremlin-aligned messaging bursts were roughly twice as frequent as pro-Western ones and about three times as frequent for posts appearing on multiple platforms, indicating tighter synchronization.

Social Media Risk Assessment Tool

Evaluate your privacy and security risks across social media platforms

Social Media Privacy Risk AssessmentPrivacy Blog Team

Tailoring Narratives and Exploiting Opportunities

The messaging strategies are far from monolithic, varying significantly between actors:

• Russian Narratives: These are characterized by an emotional and defamatory tone, consistently aiming to undermine NATO's credibility. They portray NATO as an aggressive, untrustworthy force responsible for escalating tensions and waging a "proxy war". Russia is often framed as a "reluctant defender of civilization". Russian actors are notably opportunistic, actively exploiting global events and changes in US administration policies to intensify their targeting of Ukraine, the EU, and NATO.
  • Post-US Election Shift: After the US elections, pro-Russian messaging intensified dramatically. Accusations shifted from policy disagreements to claims of NATO rigging the US election, dragging Europe "into ruin," plotting "color revolutions," and even preparing a nuclear strike. Pro-Kremlin actors also opportunistically increased their referencing of Elon Musk (3.8 times more in English, 1.7 times more in Russian) to amplify pro-Trump, anti-Biden, anti-NATO, and Ukraine-skeptical viewpoints.
  • Specific Peaks: The sources detail various peaks in pro-Kremlin messaging, each marked by intensified dissemination of aggressive, conspiratorial, and nationalist narratives, covering themes like "Traditional-Values Defender," "Globalist Plot Alarm," "NATO Aggression Spin," "Ukraine Illegitimacy Claims," "Russian Triumphalism," "Nuclear-Threat Rhetoric," "Proxy-War Allegations," and "Anti-Globalist Revolt".
• Chinese Narratives: China's messaging focuses on showcasing its own strength and portraying the US as weak, corrupt, and aggressive. Official Chinese communication is described as strategic, calm, and patient, emphasizing US weaknesses from a position of strength, contrasting with the more emotional Russian communication. China's efforts to undermine NATO's involvement in the Indo-Pacific utilize a deliberate messaging strategy that includes:
  • A "Cold-War frame" (e.g., "cold_war_mentality," "ideological_bias") casting NATO as an outdated, confrontational relic.
  • A "victim-blame cluster" ("vilify," "blame_shifting") portraying the Alliance as unfairly attacking China.
  • An "expansion-interference cluster" ("eastward," "expand_mandate") reinforcing the idea that NATO is overstepping its original remit.
  • An "instability cluster" ("destabilise," "stoke_confrontation") framing NATO activity as a direct threat to regional order.

breached.company/the-ghost-in-the-machine-unpacking-psyops-and-5th-gen-warfare-in-the-ai-era/

The AI Factor: A New Frontier of Manipulation

Artificial intelligence is no longer an emerging technology but a significant force transforming the digital space for both defensive and hostile purposes.

• Rapid Content Generation: AI enables the rapid creation of diverse content, including misleading videos, audio, images, and text, allowing for the quick exploitation of political events and crises. This means adversaries can almost instantly tailor, schedule, and amplify content, leveraging emerging interoperability standards for autonomous systems.
• Deepfakes and AI-Generated Visuals: While early deepfakes were a primary concern, they remain so. Pro-Kremlin actors use low-quality deepfakes to depict Western leaders engaged in drug abuse, a tactic previously used against Zelenskyy. There are also examples of obvious AI-generated images used by state-owned news agencies, often paired with ironic or sensational headlines, and then reshared across platforms. Manipulated videos, like those falsely claiming Soviet soldier portraits were displayed on Berlin billboards, are a growing concern.
• AI in Platform Features: The integration of AI assistants, like X's Grok, directly into social media platforms presents new dynamics. While these bots can potentially aid in fact-checking, they are prone to AI shortcomings such as hallucinations, inconsistent reasoning, and biased output, and can be intentionally manipulated. An incident where Grok generated opinionated content regarding "white genocide in South Africa" underscores the critical importance of ensuring neutrality and transparency in such systems.

What This Means for Your Privacy and Digital Security

The overarching goal of these sophisticated manipulation campaigns is to shape perceptions, sow discord, and erode trust in established institutions and information sources. For you, as an individual navigating the digital world, this means:

• Vigilance is Key: The increasing sophistication of AI-generated content makes it harder to distinguish between authentic and manipulated information.
• Question Everything: If something seems too sensational, too emotional, or perfectly aligns with a pre-existing bias, it's worth pausing and considering its source and intent.
• Verify, Verify, Verify: Relying on single sources, especially those with a known geopolitical agenda, is risky. Cross-referencing information with multiple, reputable sources is crucial.

The sources emphasize the vital need for public awareness campaigns that strengthen critical thinking, teach citizens to recognize manipulative techniques, and promote routine source verification. By cultivating your digital literacy and understanding these evolving tactics, you can better protect yourself from being unwilling pawns in these information wars and ensure your online experience remains truly your own.